What’s Next?

I enjoyed reading this great example of a gospel community from Seth McBee. This particular story of a simple prayer challenged me. You can read the rest here.

He suggested, “Ask the Spirit, ‘What’s next?’”

At that time, I rarely asked the Spirit to guide and empower me for mission because I was doing nothing that would require the Spirit. I was insular, hanging around only Christian people, and rarely ever engaging anyone with the Gospel or showing them the effects of the Gospel and how that might look in our community. There was no reason to pray. It would have been like asking God to help me flip the channels on my television.

Well. My wife and I prayed… Spirit, what’s next?

If you want to open the power of the Spirit like freeing a hungry lion from its cage, then ask the Spirit what’s next with a desire to show others what He’s like for the sake of making disciples.


Gospel Community

“We are not saved individually and then choose to join the church as if it were some club or support group. Christ died for his people, and we are saved when by faith we become part of the people for whom Christ died. The story of the Bible is the story of God fulfilling the promise, “I will take you as my own people, and I will be your God” (Exodus 6:7; Revelation 21:3). If the gospel is to be at the heart of church life and mission, it is equally true that the church is to be at the heart of gospel life and mission. John Stott says:”

The church lies at the very center of the eternal purpose of God. It is not a divine afterthought. It is not an accident of history. On the contrary, the church is God’s new community. For his purpose, conceived in a past eternity, being worked out in history, and to be perfected in a future eternity, is not just to save isolated individuals and so perpetuate our loneliness, but rather to build his church, that is, to call out of the world a people for his own glory.



Total Church by Tim Chester and Steve Timmis, pg. 39

Guilt and Misery

This past Lord’s Day we came to the first of the three primary divisions of the Heidelberg Catechism: man’s misery, man’s deliverance, and man’s response. These three divisions are often referred to more memorably as guilt, grace, and gratitude.

Let me state at the outset that I am thankful for the catechism’s direct approach to my sinfulness. I am glad for truth which addresses my sinfulness and points me towards my need for grace. Too often Christianity is identified with the practice of morality – or a way to improve upon my own virtue or ethics. I have even had to confront this from others as they investigate why I am a Christian. It is often assumed that I practice my faith as a way to seek some higher moral standard. This could not be farther from the truth.

I am not a Christian because I am a moral person. I am a Christian precisely because I am NOT a moral person. In fact, I am a sinful, selfish, lying, manipulating, greedy, lustful, prideful, arrogant, cowardly failure. I am a Christian because I need to be rescued. I am a Christian because I need a rescuer. In the word’s of John Newton, “I am a great sinner and Christ is a great savior.”

I am thankful that the Heidelberg Catechism does not skirt around the exact problem that needs to be addressed. I am thankful that the Catechism directly confronts my sin, guilt, and misery. Even as Christ summarizes the Law of God in Matthew 22 – what has become a warm devotional passage – I am reminded that I can not live up to all this perfectly, in fact, “I have a natural tendency to hate God and my neighbor.”

In his book The Good News We Almost Forgot: Rediscovering the Gospel in a Sixteenth Century Catechism, Kevin DeYoung writes:

The guilt section is by far the shortest with only three Lord’s Days and nine Questions and Answers. The authors of the Catechism wanted Heidelberg to be an instrument of comfort, not condemnation.

But they also realized that true, lasting consolation can only come to those who know of their need to be consoled. The first thing we need in order to experience the comfort of the gospel is to be made uncomfortable with our sin. The comfort of the gospel is to be made uncomfortable with our sin. The comfort of the gospel doesn’t skirt around the issue of sin, or ignore it like positive thinking preachers and self-help gurus. It looks sin square in the eye, acknowledges is, and deals with it. While many people will tell us to stop focusing on sin and to lighten up because we aren’t “bad” people, the Catechism tells us just the opposite. In order to have comfort, we must first see our sin induced misery.



Reverting back to Question and Answer number two, we are reminded that it is necessary to know how great our sin and misery are in order to live and die in the comfort and joy offered through the gospel. Knowing this, we can clearly see that to confront our sin and misery and to point us to our need for rescue is indeed an act of grace in itself. One we need to thank God for.

Gospel Metanarrative and Personal Gospel Salvation

J.I. Packer:

In recent years, great strides in biblical theology and contemporary canonical exegesis have brought new precision to our grasp of the Bible’s overall story of how God’s plan to bless Israel, and through Israel the world, came to its climax in and through Christ. But I do not see how it can be denied that each New Testament book, whatever other job it may be doing, has in view, one way or another, Luther’s primary question: how may a weak, perverse, and guilty sinner find a gracious God? Nor can it be denied that real Christianity only really starts when that discovery is made. And to the extent that modern developments, by filling our horizon with the great metanarrative, distract us from pursuing Luther’s question in personal terms, they hinder as well as help in our appreciation of the gospel. (In My Place Condemned He Stood, 26-27)

(HT: Kevin DeYoung)